DATA-SURVEY: Migrant Acceptance Index: A Global Examination of the Relationship Between Interpersonal Contact and Attitudes toward Migrants

John H. Fleming, Neli Esipova, Anita Pugliese, Julie Ray, Rajesh Srinivasan


Using independently sampled Gallup World Poll survey data from 140 countries, we explored the relationship between interpersonal contact and attitudes toward migrants from a perspective not typically found in the social psychological literature. We hypothesized that respondents who report personally knowing a migrant living in their home country would be more accepting of migrants generally (using a three-item Migrant Acceptance Index (MAI) score) than respondents who do not know a migrant. Results supported our hypothesis in 134 of the 140 countries suggesting that the strong relationship between interpersonal contact and attitudes toward migrants is near-universal. We also quantified migrant acceptance at the country level, finding a wide spectrum of attitudes toward migrants. Low acceptance countries were located primarily in Eastern and Southeastern Europe and high acceptance countries were located in Northern Europe and sub-Saharan Africa. We discuss these results in the context of interpersonal contact theory (Allport, 1954) and the larger context of global migration.


migrant acceptance; attitudes; interpersonal contact; Gallup World Poll

Full Text:



Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., Mayuil, A., Demoulin, S., & Leyens, J-P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis amongst majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843- 856.

Brown, K. T., Brown, T. N., Jackson, J. S., Sellers, R. M., & Manuel, W. J. (2003). Teammates on and off the field? Contact with Black teammates and the racial attitudes of White student athletes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1379-1403. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01954.x

Brown, R. & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255-343). doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5

Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Miflin Co.

Cehajic, S., Brown, R., & Castano, E. (2008). Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29(3), 351-367.

Central Intelligence Agency. (2016). The World Factbook. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved from the-world-factbook/index.html

Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1955). A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review, 20(2), 210-217.

Edwards, M. (2016). Rethinking Eastern European racism., March 22. Retrieved December 14, 2017 from

Harwood, J., Hewstone, M., Paolini, S., & Voci, A. (2005). Grandparent-grandchild contact and attitudes toward older adults: Moderator and mediator effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 393-406.

Herek, G. M. (1987). The instrumentality of attitudes: Toward a neofunctional theory. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 99-114. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00227.x

Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). Some of my best friends: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals attitudes toward gay men and lesbians personality. Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412-424. doi:10.1177/0146167296224007

Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K. (1993). Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 239-244. doi:10.1080/00224499309551707

Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Voci, A., McLernon, F., Niens, U., & Noor, M. (2004). Intergroup forgiveness and guilt in Northern Ireland: Social psychological dimensions of The Troubles. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 193215). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hindriks, P., Verkuyten, M., & Coenders, M. (2014). Interminority attitudes: The roles of ethnic and national identification, contact, and multiculturalism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(1), 54-74.

Horn, H. (2015). Is Eastern Europe any more xenophobic than Western Europe? Investigating a stereotype of the refugee crisis. The Atlantic, October 15. Retrieved December 21, 2017 from international/archive/2015/10/xenophobia-eastern-europe-refugees/410800/

Islam, M. R. & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700-710. doi:10.1177/0146167293196005

Kende J., Phalet K., Van Den Noortgate W., Kara A., Fischer R. (2017). Equality revisited: A cross-cultural meta-analysis of the contact hypothesis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, September 12. doi:10.1177/1948550617728993

Maliepaard, M. & Phalet, K. (2012). Social integration and religious identity expression among Dutch Muslims: The role of minority and majority group contact. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(2), 131-148.

Malik, K. (2015). Is Eastern Europe really more racist than the west? The New York Times, November 3. Retrieved from

Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67, 281-315.

McCauley, C. Plummer, M., Moskalenko, S., & Mordkoff, J. T. (2001). The Exposure Index: A measure of intergroup contact. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 7(4), 321-336.

Paolini S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., & Voci, A. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: the mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770-786. doi:10.1177/0146167203262848

Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (5), 751783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751. PMID 16737372

Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta?analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922-934. doi:10.1002/ejsp.504

Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York: Psychology Press.

Sakoda, J. M. (1981). A generalized index of dissimilarity. Demography, 18(2), 245-250.

Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., Kpper, B., Zick, A., & Wagner, U. (2012). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: A cross-national comparison in Europe. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75, 1, 28-51.

Smith, S. J., Axelton, A. M., & Saucier, D. A. (2009). The effects of contact on sexual prejudice: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 61(3-4), 178-191. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9627-3

Swart, H., Hewstone, M., Christ, O., & Voci, A. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221-1238.

Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Tausch, N., Maio, G., & Kenworthy, J.B. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 119-136.

Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J.B., Cairns, E., Marinetti, C., Geddes, L., & Parkinson, B. (2008). Postconflict reconciliation: Intergroup forgiveness and implicit biases in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 303-320.

Theil, H. (1967). Economics and information theory. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). (2016). International Migration Report 2015. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from

White, M. J. (1983). The measurement of spatial segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 88(5), 1008-1018.

White, M. J. (1986). Segregation and diversity measures in population distribution. Population Index, 52, 198-221.

World Bank Group. (2017). World Bank country and lending groups the current 2018 fiscal year. New York: World Bank. Retrieved from


  • There are currently no refbacks.